Peer Review Information
Peer review is an essential step for ensuring the quality of the manuscripts published in The Journal. We use a double-blind peer review process for manuscript review. Peer reviewers consider the appropriateness of the manuscript for The Journal, ensure the writing is clear and concise (i.e., figures are consistent with text, key messages are highlighted), and verify that the article is appropriately cited. Peer reviewers also ensure the conclusions from original work are appropriate for the rigor of the evaluation methods.
Prohibition of Generative AI Tools in Peer Reviews:
The use of generative AI tools to support peer reviews is strictly prohibited. Peer reviewers are explicitly forbidden from entering confidential, embargoed, or private information into public AI tools, such as ChatGPT. Since the data entered into these tools becomes part of the repository used for content generation, the confidentiality of papers under review is compromised.
Interested in becoming a peer reviewer? Fill out the survey below:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PLT6FQQ
Sign-ups are checked monthly; you will receive an email once you are added to the peer reviewer database
- Editorial Process
- Peer Reviewer Expectations
- Peer Review Evaluation Criteria for Original Works
- Peer Review Evaluation Criteria for Reviews and Continuing Education
Prohibition of Generative AI Tools in Peer Reviews:
The use of generative AI tools to support peer reviews is strictly prohibited. Peer reviewers are explicitly forbidden from entering confidential, embargoed, or private information into public AI tools, such as ChatGPT. Since the data entered into these tools becomes part of the repository used for content generation, the confidentiality of papers under review is compromised.
Interested in becoming a peer reviewer? Fill out the survey below:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/PLT6FQQ
Sign-ups are checked monthly; you will receive an email once you are added to the peer reviewer database